Tiggy-Winkle herself who paved the way for an entire raft of animal children’s books featuring non-cute creatures. ( The spines are modified hairs, Norman.) Did someone ask for a non-hairy hedgehog? How about this meatball! He didn’t think dirty hedgehogs would appeal to kids - probably because they’re not fluffy. Norman hadn’t been keen on a ‘hedgehog book’, either.
Lucie didn’t garner much of an audience at all - everyone preferred the character of Mrs. Everyone who sets out to write ‘boy books’ and ‘girl books’ is always completely wrong, of course. Potter’s concept was a hard sell - publisher Norman Warne (about to become her fiancé) couldn’t see the appeal but he must’ve conceded he wasn’t a girl himself so Beatrix would know better, and Beatrix won (as she often did).īut Beatrix was wrong about the appeal of Lucie. We live with gender isomorphism, in which there are ‘men’ and ‘failed men’. We don’t live in a gender binary - that suggests two categories which are equal. *Gender binary is not an ideal term, though it’s used widely. this book will appeal to boys because X this will appeal to girls because Y. She thought that Lucie’s feminine garb, with its emphasis on the lost clothing items (o, calamity!), would appeal to girls especially.Įven today, authors and publishers are creating children’s books for the gender binary* e.g. Tiggy-Winkle specifically to appeal to girls.
0 kommentar(er)
